Key competencies - a visual introduction

Now I'm all inspired to work on my presentation....

The New Zealand Curriculum Five Key Competencies

View more OpenOffice presentations from Daniel Hrstich.

Content creation and the NZ curriculum

Most people who work with me know that I am all about content creation. For me, it's a big part of being a constructionist practitioner. As students make their own meanings, by relating to something they already know or by being entranced by something, or through taking or whatever, then I think they should be creating their own content too.

Recently, I was reading through the summary of the findings of the Digital Youth Project, which I think has some fascinating research with big implications for education. In particular, I was really taken with their definition of youth interactions online as taking one of three main forms - hanging out, messing around and geeking out.

Here's how the researchers introduce their topic:

Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out are three genres of participation that describe different forms of commitment to media engagement, and they correspond to different social and learning dynamics. In this section, we draw from the lengthier description in our book Hanging Out, Messing Around, and Geeking Out to highlight the key features of these genres of participation, supported with illustrative examples. The examples highlighted here represent only a portion of the more substantial ethnographic support for the findings in our book, which are organized according to key domains of youth practice: friendship, intimacy, family, gaming, creative production, and work. Here we draw from this material in order to highlight the three genres of participation and focus specifically on the learning dynamics that we documented.

Now, apart from the way I made immediate grabby fingers about wanting to get the actual book, I also had a few moments of thinking about what the intersection between being a constructivist teacher and a web2.0 teacher might look like.

Now, I plan to dig into this further. There are a lot of papers to be read, resources to be gathered and so on. But to me, the key to being both a constructivist and a web2.0 pedagogue lies in the concept of content creation

By that I mean not just using web2.0 tools for instruction, no matter how awesome it is to show youtube clips to illustrate concepts. Yeah, that's great, but we need to go further and have students using these web2.0 tools to create their own content. Content that means a lot to them as well as to me. Importantly, it's also content they can share with others.

So. My plan for the next little while is to delve into this and make a case for it - using web2.0 technologies in a way that encourages content creation amongst students.

Four computers per classroom

In my ideal world, I would have a class set of laptops. Failing that, having a pod of four computers at the back of the classroom is still pretty awesome.

Four computers is enough that students who finish early can use them to do extension work - like the students in my class today who are playing Fantastic Contraption because they finished their work and did not need to go back and revise earlier work. Four computers is enough - just - that groups can use it for a stations activity, with the other stations being paper-based.

But four computers is not enough when you want students to use online resources to create something new - a presentation or a poster or a video or whatever.

I'm really lucky. The class I tried this with first - Y9 science - is always on at the same time as only one other class. That means I can spread my 24 students around 12 computers across three classrooms. It works - but it's not ideal. When students have a question to ask me or hit a snag, they have to come and find me. It relies on students being able to work unsupervised in empty classrooms - or be trusted not to disrupt the learning in occupied classrooms. I am still not sure of the long-term value of having just four computers in my classroom, but I'm not giving up on making it work yet.

Oh, and since I'm here, here's a link to the wordle that one group made: They are so pleased with themselves.

Laptop for the win

My laptop is made of awesome. Awesome, I tell you

Rube Goldberg machines for energy transformations and forces

I'm teaching physics at four different levels right now. What a mission! I'm getting all tangled up in which ones are doing rotational motion and which ones are doing basic energy transformations.

But this is my favourite thing to teach, hands down. For the Y10s, we've decided to make Rube Goldberg machines a focus of how we explore energy and forces. We're going to start with how real people make them....



I found this amazing game for the students to use, just to embed the idea in their heads. And then, I am going to get them to play Fantastic Contraption. My Y13s got completely addicted to this game last year, it was so awesome.

Then I'm thinking that I might get them to make their own design for a Rube Goldberg machine. We don't have the time or space to really do it justice, so I'm thinking that we might ask the students to make the machine using small teams, using their own bodies and maybe two or three reusable props. Then we can take their designa nd analyse it for energy transformations and then for forces. I think it could be really awesome.

Next year, in the new scheme, I think I might expand on this, and actually have a two week block on making a Rube Goldberg machine. Wouldn't that be cool?

Oooh, shiny

New laptop is new and shiny *loves*

Less awesome is actually setting the thing up - but I can persist! I shall persist, until my countless and ginormous files of doom are transferred.

Actual learning took place today, because I did not get the new laptop until classes had finished for the day. My Y12s finished their mobiles and are very proud of them. My Y10s were less recalcitrant about energy transformations than anticipated, and my Y13s had not done their homework.

I keep meaning to take some photos of my classroom. It is rife with students' work, hanging from the ceiling and stuck to the walls. It is great. I love having student work on display - much nicer than having generic posters, I think.

Investigative investigations and the relationship between the physical and living worlds

There are five strands to Science in the New Zealand Curriculum, four content strands and a Nature of Science strand that integrates and permeates the others. It's not always easy to integrate the strands, though I am always looking for opportunities to do so. Today, I had an awesome opportunity to integrate the Physical World and Living World strands.

We're studying forces and motion in Y11 science at the moment. I wanted a paper helicopter investigation activity, because helicopters are pretty damn awesome. But I discovered something better (using the amazing power of google, too) - an activity that uses four different helicopter designs based on seed pods (the twirly ones).

I immediately abandoned the idea of straightforward helicopters and embraced the idea of using four different designs. The learning I wanted my students to get today was partly to do with forces. It was also to do with fair tests and how to design them. But, above all, I wanted them to get the idea that we use models in science to test things. It's hard to get to the forest to study dispersal patterns of seeds? Can we simulate it in the laboratory using other things, with similar behaviour, to get a better idea of what we should be looking for when we do actually get to the forest?

Of my five groups, three were engaged and did a good job. One was fantastic and finished the whole thing, even the extension activity about baby spiders. One wasn't engaged at all, even with my fervent encouragement. I'm not too worried.

I took some photos, and I'm going to make a collage on the wall showing their work. I'm going through a real phase of documenting student work in photo form and displaying it.